Around the time of our last federal election, I read a comment stating that if someone were trying today to begin a library, purchasing things with public funds to share with every member of society for free, they’d be laughed out of parliament. Until then, I had taken libraries for granted, never really considering how this incredible resource came to be. I started thinking about the wonderful sense of community that they instill and support, and the egalitarian access to information that we need just sign up for, and promise to return.
I don’t remember a time when I haven’t used the library. As a child, there were weekly trips, time spent reading in the cool and quiet spaces, listening to ‘storytime’ and choosing my very own stack of books. Growing older, the library was a place wherein I could assert my independence, reading about any & every subject one could imagine, travelling to faraway times and places with every turning page. Eventually, the library became a part of my education, from the high school ‘Independent Study Units’ all the way to Grad school. It is the place where we all have the opportunity to learn and understand. Anyone can walk into the library and start reading.
Now, it seems, that ability is being threatened. Councillor Doug Ford made the erroneous and well publicized statement that there are more libraries in his area than there are Tim Hortons (Torontoist), suggesting that they are unused and superfluous. One might assert that more time spent in a library would afford him the ability to do the research in which he would discover the high usage rates of these library branches, or even the simple statistics comparing the number of libraries against the number of Tim Hortons, in order to arrive at a factual conclusion. Perhaps if he had spent time in the library, he would be able to recognize the iconic Canadian writer, Margaret Atwood, who he seemingly prides himself in not knowing (theStar). The idea that libraries are unnecessary has thankfully resulted in outrage and the mobilization of thousands of Torontonians.
In most instances, Social Democracy is at odds with Neo-Liberal Capitalism, and this library debate is no different. The idea that the public good, at taxpayer expense, should make way for privatization and profit, is the real debate here, and libraries are truly at the core of it. For me, the bottom line isn’t how the libraries ‘profit’ fiscally, but rather, what kind of community I live in. Is it one where every single person has access to resources,and has the ability to acquire information, or one where only those with ample funds do? Is it a community where information is a privilege, and not a right? Libraries provide space for activities and meetings, they allow people to access the internet, and become engaged and involved. And I, for one, would far rather live in a community where we can all share these resources, and their benefits, than to live in one where profit alone dictates access.
Get more information and sign the petition to save our libraries here
Giller Prize winner Vincent Lam’s argument for the importance of libraries has some very interesting statistics regarding the actual cost per person of maintaining our libraries in this Globe & Mail article